30 June 2011

Mother and Child

This is the result of me attempting to write a story about a mother with no definitions. It's kind of long, but I thought it would be good for Ambivanthrope. As always, it's a work in progress. I hope something constructive comes from it. I think what I would appreciate most of all from you great people is feedback. It's tough, I've found, getting good feedback.

Sincerely,
Aaron McGarvey



This particular town, our town, is the kind of town that has an immeasurable kind of beauty associated with it, the likes of which our youth never realize until it becomes time for them to leave their home for the sake of education. The cycle goes in such a way that they become inflamed of their new surroundings but remain unconscious of the fact that they have not yet reached the point in life in which things stop being sensuous. But let's say that perhaps they fall in love with travel. And so they travel the world over, if they are so socially and financially inclined, and if you asked them what they were searching for, they would say “beauty” or “truth,” and perhaps they would obscure their response in such a way as to make no division between the physical and the metaphysical. But lets not assume that they've gotten there yet. They're searching for beauty, and they discover it in unfamiliar mountains and plains, cities and towns, rural areas and urban, people as well as earth, and they relish in it. Their travel yields perspective. They experience that tickling sense of foreign immersion in color, the color of their skin and the color of the dirt. And this is what reminds them. And if they happen to have a companion on their journey, so much the better, but the lack of one does not yet prevent them from having this cathartic experience.

But in all of this, mountains and plains, cities and towns, rural and urban, people and landscapes, I have overlooked the trees. For upon returning this young person encounters a sense of beauty that seems to immediately supercede those that he encountered on his journey. Perhaps he says to himself, “I've seen beautiful mountains, fertile plains and dry deserts, but there is a subtle degree to which I still feel unsatisfied, as if I were searching for something that the conscious part of me was unaware of.” But if the answer to our conundrum is simply “trees,” are there not trees in mountains? Are there no forests apart from those of our little town? Surely in all his journeys he must have come across some lush forests, forests far more dense and diverse than those of our town. Why is it, then, that he experiences such keen catharsis upon examining the trees of his own neighborhood while taking a simple stroll around the block?

“There is something different about these trees,” he says. He cannot help it; he eventually succumbs to the conclusion that the trees of his own neighborhood are simply more beautiful than any he ever saw during the course of his travels. “Perhaps it is their tallness,” he wonders. And yet, he begins to think whether that in all of his attempts to witness so many far-off places, the kind of beauty that he may actually have been looking for was the kind found in those trees that grow right there in his own neighborhood. “For,” he wonders, “why was it that when I was in the desert all I could think about was how I wanted to see trees, but when I was in the forest or the mountains, all I could think about was how these trees were not our trees.”

And so we find that the trees of our town lend to it a particular sort of cultural nostalgia. Perhaps it is the way in which they overshadow the quiet country roads. Perhaps their foliage is actually broader and more beautiful than any other place in the entire world. Perhaps, most of all, it is the sense of contrast they give to this temperate town.

Our town is a place of growth, where man and nature are co-witnesses of each other's maturity. And let me tell you, our friend was right, there really are no other trees like these in the entire world. For these are the great hardwood trees of the northeastern United States. In the space between the equinox, they are the reason the entire world fixes its eyes upon this small corner of the earth. To a child, they are limitless. To an adult, they embody the very essence of shalom. They are tall trees, taller than almost any other trees in the entire world, and in the summer the children of our town would play under the shadow of their leaves.

These particular trees, however, were not located in that small corner of the world. They were west of the beautiful Northeast- in the Midwest. This was what constituted a large part of their unusual appeal. They were rare. When you’re looking at fields, you see trees. The grass is brown, but the leaves are always green.

It was among these trees that the mother of our family brought her newborn son.

The mother, with her back bent over against the sky, asked the child if he could see the trees, and with a quiet gesture reminiscent of some disturbed peace, gently unfolded the flap of the stroller, exposing the infant’s eyes to the light of the May afternoon. Then slowly, with the air of a human being utterly conscious of intent, she exhaled deeply, and gracefully returned her hand to its normal resting place.

Around the two was a small lake, the shores of which slanted gradually upward in this part of the world not known for geographical variances. On these small hills the rich people of our town built their houses with wooden doors and large glass windows looking out onto the lake. They were always present, but never home. On the opposing side, the side on which the mother stood over her stroller, was a large grove of those amazing trees I was telling you about.

The child, with legs exposed, lay on his back facing the sky. Underneath him was a thin white blanket the mother had purchased at the department store. It did not cling to his skin (as fabric does on the days of hopeless humidity in the summers of our town), but provided his legs with the rare feeling of a dry and perfect cool. Such days come only several times a year, when nature proclaims death to its extremes, and its raucous poles, for a short time, relinquish their polarization.

Staring upward helplessly, the child’s pupils glistened in the afternoon light, reflecting in them the broad canopy of leaves under which he lay. And what a canopy it was! The broad maple leaves filtered the light so that, when he looked up, the child witnessed a particularly golden type of light, the purest of the pure, not unlike witnessing the sunset though it was still mid-afternoon. The infant, whose mother named him Lucas, was seeing the purest of the pure.

This pureness also saw him. The leaves, too, shaded him. And the mother loved him, absent yet of inclination. His legs, bubbled with fat, twitched. His face contorted. All of his body moved in the new medium of air. Lucas was never born into a vacuum.

The mother, with back bent over against the sky, asked if the child could see the trees. But the infant’s legs just twitched, and his face swung.

Our mother, whose name was Angela, found herself increasingly irritated at the tepid movements of the child. She was angry at his inability to feel guilt. This was because, if Angela were honest with herself, she was a little bit envious of her child’s lack of consciousness. This, however, was not the good kind of envy, the kind that gives you a healthy dose of holy admiration. No, Angela’s envy of her child was more of a jealous poison, and both she and God cultivated the root.

For Angela Erma, these frustrations bubbled over that day underneath the trees beside the lake. What we must understand is that this woman had been through a little bit more physical and psychological stress than, say, your average person. As to the exact causes of her emotional instability I cannot say, for I have to tell you that I do not know. What I can tell you is that she was a scrawny woman with blotchy pale skin and sunken eyes. The second daughter of Earl Blonski, a cattle rancher from Laramie, Wyoming, she was born on the family ranch in 1935. She grew up with somewhat of a peculiar and introverted psychological disposition, divulging into obscure subjects at school and home. She suffered from Hemophilia. When you, the reader, understand this fact, you may actually find that it is easier for you to dig deeper into your soul in search of that atom-sized kernel of grace that you know is still there. I know, it’s hard. It’s difficult to give grace to this woman when you do not know her story. And truly what I’m asking you to do is a little bit ridiculous. When I say, “I do not know her story,” it’s perfectly possible that you may choose to disbelieve me. I’m asking you to give her grace while at the same time telling you, “I do not know why you should give her grace.” But men must act irrationally every once in a while, if only to buck the trend. Soon, very soon, I will ask you to cultivate a feeling of hatred for an innocent child. So there you have it.

Angela Erma knew a thing or two about irrational behavior. Furthermore, for some reason unknown to us all, she began attempting to convince herself that her three-week old son was worthless. Looking into the stroller, into the face of her adorable little babe, Angela clenched her fists, and, foaming at the mouth, spoke with a loud voice that afternoon beside the lake:

“How am I to help my son? Should I hope for you, child? Would you involve me with you? In future times I plot your course, or scribble on the page? I am bending over you, then drawing back. Bending over, drawing back! Should I leave you children? Should I leave you? Fashion for me my expectations! Will you become the head or be smashed against the rocks?

“How am I to help you? I could have great hopes for you, Lucas, wonderful expectations. Tell me, am I to believe that? I would spend on you, put the meaning of my life in you. What would you need? Money? Education? Status? You would have them. I would put you in a place of expectation. They would train you. ‘There’s something deep inside you,’ they would say, ‘like a parasite.’ Then they would place a small morsel on your tongue. You would be like a monk, Lucas, only you would have something important these monks don’t have. Do you know what that would be, Lucas? I’ll tell you. Human expectation. Everything in your life is based on an identified quantity of stored energy. The monks engage in the same habits without any premonition of worldly accomplishment. You would suffer for the sake of your potential. But all these things- they are based on investments. What is my return? Vicarious greatness, Lucas, in the immanent world.

“How am I to help my son? I’m bending over, then drawing back. I could surrender you to the map of Mother Earth. Relinquish. Tell me, would she care for you? I would set you down on the warm grass in a sheltered wood, and there I would leave you and these great expectations. Would you survive? Even if there were a shallow pool and the most accessible apple trees in the entire Midwest, you would not survive. But this is not the point. I would be helping you. She would swallow you up, but I would be free. No commitment, Lucas, I would have no commitment. In that moment I would make this grandiose speech about how I am surrendering up your life to the flustered broadcaster. He does the work, but he revises his plans. He is sitting at his desk, throwing the old copies over his shoulder.

“But even more than your life (I would say), I am surrendering my expectations. For when do men stop mourning for the loss of a child? After they have made peace with the fleeting pain the child may have suffered at the precise moment of their death? Perhaps, but surely this is but a small fraction of the whole. No, men mourn until their expectations are lowered. This is how boys become men and how men become old men. In the early stages of their grieving, they say things like ‘You could have been a great man,’ and they cry for the recognition their child will never receive. But it a curious thing to witness those who appear to abandon all hope. They are jokers, then, and they always succeed unless you can come up with a sound and legitimate reason for peace. When you have contrast, Lucas, life blooms. This is why I am hell-bent on making your childhood particularly shitty. Maybe you’ll get a cloudy day or two. A reflection, perhaps. How am I to help you? I’ll teach you curse words, and how to scream in the streets.

“I am surrendering my expectations, but tell me, Lucas, do I really have anything to surrender?

“Surely we must now consider suicide together. Haven’t you considered, Lucas, whether the best thing right now for the two of us wouldn’t be to drown ourselves here in this lake? Yes, I do believe the best possible scenario may be to ship you down the Nile, Lucas. Or tell me whether you would not honestly have me leave you in a trashcan somewhere to fester with your being? You always talk about dying, Lucas, and for that I am eternally grateful.

“There I go again, thinking that I care about you. It’s inevitable, Lucas, the expectation. The clock only moves one way, but it’s always moving. Either life or death- things for which I can pray. And which is better? Binary, Lucas, my position is binary! I’m drawing a line, Lucas, but the broadcaster bends it to a circle! How am I to know? The wisest man says, ‘I am not wise. What is a definition?’ We do not possess the faculties. Where is love and hate, hope and abandon, belief and….what? What are they? What is the universal definition? You know it! Sitting there in the peak of your maturity, you know it, but you cannot speak! We’re cursed! Listen! The babe knows the secret, but he cannot speak!

“No, it’s not worth it. You will come to nothing, and I will have wasted my time. I will not hope; I will not be disappointed. And that is why I am telling you that you are already a failure at just three weeks old. You will wander with the fairies, Lucas, and you won’t get anything done. You have already reached the peak of your maturity and you have let me down. Yes, you are nothing and will become no one. I’m taking that weight off my back. I will be free of you, Lucas, free of your screaming and your loss of innocence. Can you promise me, Lucas, that you will fail in this life? I must make sure of it. What collateral can you give me to ensure that my efforts are not in vain?

“You are scaring me, Lucas. I am concerned about the nature of my investments. I am scared after all that I have said that you will become a great man. And what shall you think of me when you do? You will call for me, and I shall be held to account! Dammit, Lucas, can’t I control you? Look, there is an angel in the sky! ‘All’s hell that is not heaven!’ You’re doing this! Stop! Stop Lucas, I beg of you! I admit it; I have proclaimed the death of my child!

“Ouch! Ouch! I have looked at the sky, and now my own words hurt me! I have cursed, then seen the limits of outer space! It hurts me so! I have become perceptive again, seeing all things. How could I doubt the meaning of sacrifice? It’s meaning is to cry! If only I could cry perpetually! Now, finally, I feel it coming over the mountains like a great rushing river! Where is my violence? Send if off a cliff! Where is that torturous noise? Bludgeon me with silence! Come with me! I will show you a garden, a beautiful garden! It is a garden of the West, untouched, an oasis of love. Drink from the fountain, Lucas, and I will be forgiven! You know that it must end with love! You know that we will all fall down and weep before the tree of life! You know how we will be bludgeoned with beauty, and how it will hurt more than a bullet from a gun! You, now, are always convinced of its beauty.

“I see now that you will become great no matter what I say. It is as certain as the damnation of Faust! You will bathe in the black hole and worship the broadcaster! He will show you places that we cannot face yet. He’s going to tear you to pieces. You will cry, everyday, for humanity. All you will do is cry! It is you that will leave me in the woods! O what has come over me? I was running a good race…

“How am I to help my son? I have told you you will fail. So you will become great. Ah, now you see that this was my plot all along! Die, child, die! I am the most loving of all mothers! Don’t you see, Lucas? I don’t control your fate, but I will still be held to account. How am I to help my son? What is love, and what is loving? I make assumptions, Lucas, in order to live."

At this point, Angela Erma broke down and cried. At three weeks old, Lucas did not yet know how to talk. But if he did, there is no doubt that he would have comforted his mother. He would have told her that things were not as bad as they seemed. He was, actually, a promising young child, despite his mother’s violent emotions.

17 February 2011

Stony Fork

This piece was meant to be a subject review concerning delight. The subject being Stony Fork Creek. It turned into an ode to place and eldership.

Stony Fork starts out in rural society and ends nowhere. Driving through random dilapidated dairy farms and trailer parks primes expectations of cigars and hastens the desire for beer. Once through the maze of Americana, there is a pullover (the first of many) that has been expanded to a muddy parking loop. Norman Maclean is nowhere to be seen. This first real view of the stream is disappointing. Shallow pools of cigarette butts are no guarantee of delight. It shows that everyone and their brother have tracked up this same spot in hopes of an easy catch. Wide banks with a narrow streambed will turn away hedonist anglers. The ones who want it now, and if it does not come, will light up another one and get back in the truck.

Flowing in from a mountain gully in the west is a native trout stream that the hedonist will never notice. The choice at this point is to take the path downstream (the banks are too narrow to walk) or explore the native entity to the north. People have been known to pull calm, native Brook Trout from the entity’s waters. The thought of telling friends of this feat is enticing, but one knows that the patience is not there, that is why one comes here in the first place. It is an illusive patience. Grabbing a fish out of water takes a person who has visited Stony Fork many times before and already knows that it has mystery.

So much for this shallow pool of beginners. It reminds too much of everything that I do not want to be. Thistles covering chunky fossilized rocks prohibit streamside travel. The other end of the parking loop has a school bus colored forestry gate. The gate is hardly ever open. If I walk down the path the stream will disappear. Tall maples and short pines take its place, the occasional porcupine is making an escape up one of the unlucky maples. Coming out into a clearing two cabins are resting on the left while on the right the stream has cut a mini canyon in the yard. Where the trees start again is where it begins, the drowning pause of delight. By this time I should take out my rod, reel, and flies. Too many people lose themselves in the debate of fly rods or bait rods. We might as well go back home and compare Audi’s and BMW’s on the Internet. At least then we could see deeper into the mystery of both sides. No one understands the mystery of these two rods, nay Wes Jordan.

Today it is the fly rod, because its mystery seems more relevant to the confusion of life. Its back and forth motions are not unlike systems of belief that never settle. The bait rod just throws its fortune and waits. The fly rod would not settle for this confidence, stretching farther in each direction until it has the fullest amount of Métis to lay itself to rest. Stony Fork is an unforgiving stream for a fly rod. The trees overhang to see what I am up to, apparently ruffled at the disturbance of their beautiful trout.

Matching the hatch, so many bugs fly around that it is difficult to tell what should be mimicked and what should be swatted. After the fourth fly (one vanished due to a faulty knot, so did a second, then a third fell pray to a watching tree) I resume the wandering rhythm of casting. The few casting channels that Stony Fork provides are polluted lines of fluorescent green. Shadow casting is a secret that only Paul knows, but I pretend to have a big brother looking on behind me, describing estranged methods.

In the middle of the deep, elongated pool there lies Stony Fork’s palomino. A fish that will mock all anglers till the end of time. The hedonistic anglers make the trek this far downstream to try their luck with this being. Always they will be eluded. One day I hope to hook the lip of this fish, hold it in my hands with everyone looking on, and then throw it back. Then they will never come back, the ones who don’t look for anything but pleasure. Stony Fork will then prove too strange a place for them, one where people catch the meaning of everything and let it go. I’ll do my part to keep it this kind of place. Not that I really have any power to change it in the first place, but forced ignorance is important from time to time.

Downstream a figure bends over and straightens again. It is my father, his grey wool and worn blue baseball cap distinguishing him from the bend in the river. Too far away to induce the smell of his pipe smoke. He most often passes the domain of the palomino as if they have an understanding. He sees through the enticement of large, deep, and still pools. Life has pulled him under too many times for him to be fooled by the dormant waters. Besides, his son has a fascination with the grandeur of space and depth, let him have the big places.

After I learn this lesson again, I pull in my line and start treading down to meet my father. I come up behind him and watch him with his bait rod in a swift pool. Most who come this far pass by this small angular part of the stream. I can see his delight in this. A corner of rock that will some day be worn in his footprints holds him like a babe. A sly but cheerful look as he gently pulls a reluctant trout out of the rapids. I sigh and move on, all the while envious of his ability to simultaneously smoke his pipe and fish.

Onward down the stream I look for my own place of delight, my own small spot in the stream. Rapids after logs after spooked deer, it is nowhere to be found. Eventually I am in a glen of leaves and trees. In front of me is a boulder that was moved from Stony Fork with some unspeakable force. Most likely the fossilized rocks witnessed this feat. I witness the result. There is no one in sight, the sun razing through the trees and flickering with the wind. There are no fish in my bag but my heart is full. I have forgotten everything in the wonder of not knowing. Delight of this kind cannot be held in one place, my heart is not big enough for these kinds of things. I follow Stony Fork back to a place I hope to one day understand, and cast my line, timidly, beside my father’s.

31 January 2011

Ambivanthropology -or- "Hell Is Other People"

Brothers and sisters,

I am relieved to be back attending to my duties as the curator of AmbivAnthrope, our collaborative weblog. I had a heck of a two weeks prior, covering for a coworker who fell ill, and have had little rest in my auxiliary (albeit bill-paying) duties of expertly preparing espresso drinks (or what basically amount to xanthine-laced cups of steamy milk flavored with the tiniest bits of diligently harvested, transnationally shipped and carefully roasted coffee, the deliciousness of which is then negated by abominable proportions of tooth-decaying sugary syrups requested by our esteemed ivy-league-university-enrolled patrons, because they cannot abide, much less savor bitter complexity in any form, be it coffee or life).

Now that I've got that off my chest; onward, and upward.

This week's entry is about our name, AmbivAnthrope, because, as my former professors have informed me, I am far too happy to make up words and then conveniently forget to define them, leaving the less-intuitive reader up the proverbial creek. Believe me, it's actually a load of fun for precisely the same reason. Of course, as I suspected, those few of you who have talked to me about the name have avidly thought up your own definitions using your good old SAT-prep context clues. But here's what I had in mind for those of you still wondering.

Ok, so, to be completely honest I didn't have anything in mind. In the first place, what I really required was a blog title that hadn't already been taken, and seeing as the entire lexicon of the English language has been made a website (official, and as-yet-to-be-recognized slang inclusive) and seeing also as "philoso_raptor70048.blogspot.com" simply would not do for obvious reasons, I enlisted my old habit of word invention, and decided I could just tack on any old definition ex post facto, because, well, this is America ain't it?

The idea came to me when I was trying to develop an overarching ethos of what this clearing we've slash-and-burned into the internet was to be all about. Of course, the primary drive of AmbivAnthrope is to specifically not prescribe an overarching ethos, and I wanted a word to reflect the the openness of this space, unhindered as I hope it is of political polarization, thoughtless theologism, pretentious pontification, or abstracted obfuscation. Of course, regarding the content of our contributions, one can be sure to find all (even the obtusest) degrees of slant in these categories, their authors being real, opinionated people in a world of words, but the blog itself is to have an air of laissez-faire, ideologically speaking.

So it struck me. Every time we read one another's material we do our very darnedest to suspend our own presuppositions momentarily in order to give another's ideas a fair shot. It's more than a mere courtesy to do so. It's a requirement for the transmission, creation, and flourishing of ideas. We pour ourselves into them after all, and outright dismissal of any thought in bad faith is worse on the soul than the most scathingly honest criticism made in good faith. It is not a ethic devoid of judgment or critique, but one that prescribes the method of such critique in a way as to foster mutual respect among ourselves.

When you behold, engage and respond to any contribution on this blog, you are an AmbivAnthrope.

The word itself, if you haven't guessed, is a portmanteau of a few existent terms. The first two, from which we borrow our suffix, form a sort of dualism between themselves. They are, according to a paraphrase of the Oxford American:

misanthrope - n. a person who dislikes humankind and avoids human society

&

philanthrope - n. (archaic) a person with the desire to promote the welfare of others

If you'll note, as I did, that there lie before us only two options regarding how to feel about the entirety of humanity, situated at the poles of hate (gk. misein) and love (gk. philein) you might be, as I was, a tad disappointed with the English language for failing to provide not only a mediated option (well, maybe I feel so-so about humankind) much less an option that doesn't devolve into either useless Calvinist cynicism or vapid humanist optimism, and lets us take a fair view of our world before we make a one-word judgement about the whole damned lot of us.

The third term, whose prefix we have borrowed is:

ambivalent - adj. having mixed feelings or contradictory ideas about something or someone

Bingo!

Put it all together and what do you get?

ambivanthrope - n. a person having mixed feelings or contradictory ideas about humankind and human society


Now there's a term that sums us all up neat and tidy like and wouldn't cost anyone's firstborn if I felt like purchasing a domain! For you linguistics types out there, kindly forgive the bastard union of a German prefix with a Greek suffix, because, once again, say it with me, with feeling: this is America.

I want to stress of course, that ambivanthropy is not at all a new concept. Some of the greatest unwitting ambivanthropes have written things, that unlike my own works, have actually contributed to the development of society and our ability to comprehend its unending problems. Karl Marx comes to mind, what with his fatalistic view of class warfare offset by the gleeful prospect of a freer future. Otherwise, I think of Flannery O'Connor, who reveals that human grace prevails, if often dormant, in a sterile and hostile world of banality and evil.

One lesser known ambivanthrope, in a work entitled Pedagogy of the Heart, has inspired much of my ambivalence on the subject of human nature. His name is Paolo Freire. He was a Brazilian educator, activist and writer on political and sociological theory. I wish to leave you tonight with his words. Before I do I'll leave you with a question or two to get your mind going for the comments. Who else can we term an ambivanthrope? Where else have you seen a refusal to capitulate one's view of humanity to a dualistic black-or-white paradigm? Do you hate this word and its definition? Speak up!

guilelessly,
b. guiles 

From Pedagogy of the Heart by Paulo Freire:
It is not very difficult to invert Sartre's sentence and state that happiness lies within others. In large part, more-or-less artificial political divisions touch on this generally nonexplicit belief that man is either naturally good or naturally evil. Today, we know the extent to which contexts that pitch man against man generate hell, whereas contexts that generate solidarity build environments where people feel more fulfilled (27).

19 January 2011

on the right foot (paw?)

While I was dalliantly assembling what was to be the first--and therefore most daunting--post of our nascent parcel on the 'blogosphere' (how hip am I on the lingo!) most of you voiced your ire at my molluscan pace with getting this boat on the road.

One of you, however, had the presence of mind to simply do my job for me.

And so, I express my humblest gratitude to our friend, who wishes only to be known as The Obstinate Badger--and so he shall--for this poem: "Unmediated Mystical Meditation #3."

(And did a voice on the wind just suggest it may become a series?)

Unmediated Mystical Meditation #3

By The Obstinate Badger

I pine just like the Fathers for theosis,
To bridge the barren barge between our closeness

(But preferably to bypass all the requisite kenosis).

If Jerusalem has much to do with Athens,
Then I’ll need concepts for the interactions

(But as it stands, I’m weak in Greek philosophy and classics).

Should I partake more oft in anamnesis,
Or forfeit fervent prayer for poesis?

(Will life afford me time enough to process every thesis?)

I’ve strived to strip myself of ill intention
For purity of heart and strict attention

(But it seems I’ve lost my ladder built for spiritual ascension).

09 January 2011

our forty acres of cyberspace

Dearest Comrades,

I welcome you to AmbivAnthrope, a collaborative web log (or as the kids say, "blog") about nothing in particular and everything all at once.

As most of you whom I have invited to contribute are recent college graduates trying, even at this very moment, to hack it in this rather dumb world I'm sure you, like me, miss the days when you could camp out a room in the library with your friends during finals week from open to close doing anything but studying much to the ire of better scholars; or perhaps when you were thanking whatever stars got you home to a beer and some good company after a terrifying inebriated bike ride home in the snow; or maybe it was those times you staved off the sleep you so desperately needed and stood around underneath the summer stars trying to hash out the finer points of just one of your friend's recent existential crises.

We've all been there, folks. We look back with gratitude for the abandon others have shown in giving up time, sleep, coffee money, prescription amphetamines, studying, and precious mental resources to contribute to the sort of stimulating palaver that shows nowhere on our transcripts, yet to each of us surely represents what we consider the real education that we practiced, constructed, created and anything but "received" during our too-short time together.

This brings me back to AmbivAnthrope. A collaborative web log (blog, remember?), in which some of my personal favorite minds and myself could once again chit the chat about... you know... stuff again, has been a hare-brained idea rattling around my skull since sometime in mid-2010 and that I never got around to until just the other day when I came to the awful realization that I wished I had a paper to write or something to cold start this already rusty brain.

I suspect that you, too, have felt such a longing. Now, granted some of you went right to grad school, so you're writing more in a few months than you did your entire undergrad careers. OK. Whatever. You can just follow along. But something even slicker to do would be to use this space as a forum to hash out your fancy-pants grad school ideas, eh? I mean, you've got set before you no dearth of minds whom you respect willing to give free, Creative Commons-licensed feedback on all your grad school hoight, and yes even your toight. That means you, Mr. Ebersole.

As far as format and content is concerned, I would like to not be the only one writing short pieces for this blog. The method of this collaboration will be as follows:
1) We will cycle through piece writers, perhaps semi-monthly, or as we grow in contributorship, even weekly. I will post a schedule if we agree on it with (gasp) deadlines. Topic is the piece-writers choice. Length is also just a matter of discretion. Note the NICE WIDE COURIER NEW FONT and the skeeeeny margins! Your words go far here, my friends.
2) The rest of us will carefully read each piece and comment, making sure not to be too nice, because lets not just get all soft on each other now that those jerkoff prof's aren't taking off 10% for every APA violation! AHHH THAT FELT GOOD.
3) Commence discussion and brain stimulating, er, stimuli!

Hurrah! Now hop to!


My very best regards,
b. guiles